Trump Proposes 100% Tariffs on Foreign Films, UK Productions at Risk; White House Clarifies No Final Decision

Former President Donald Trump proposed a 100% tariff on foreign-made films via Truth Social on May 4, aiming to boost U.S. film production and counter foreign incentives. The White House clarified no final decision has been made. The proposal has caused concern in Hollywood and international hubs like the UK, which benefits from U.S. productions due to tax incentives. Industry leaders are uncertain about implementation and potential impacts on international co-productions. Legal experts question the feasibility of such tariffs, and there are fears of retaliatory measures from other countries.

Trump’s Announcement and Rationale

In a post on Truth Social, Trump declared he was “authorizing the Department of Commerce, and the United States Trade Representative [USTR], to immediately begin the process of instituting a 100% Tariff on any and all Movies coming into our Country that are produced in Foreign Lands.” He claimed that “The Movie Industry in America is DYING a very fast death,” blaming foreign tax incentives for drawing productions away from U.S. soil and labeling the trend a “national security threat.”

The proposal reportedly followed a meeting with actor Jon Voight, who submitted a plan suggesting that if a U.S.-based production could have been made domestically but instead received foreign tax incentives, it should be subject to a tariff equal to 120% of the value of those incentives.

Industry Reaction: Confusion and Concern

The announcement caught both the film industry and government agencies off guard. Studio executives convened emergency meetings, and the Motion Picture Association (MPA) held a special session to strategize a response. According to reports, the industry is grappling with fundamental questions: How would such tariffs be implemented? Would they apply to streaming content? What about films shot in multiple countries?

Executives expressed concern that the tariffs could disrupt the current model of international co-productions and financing. Many films, including major franchises like “Mission: Impossible,” “The Avengers,” and “Avatar,” rely on global locations and post-production services to manage costs and meet creative demands. A 100% tariff could make such projects financially unviable.

UK Film Industry in the Crosshairs

The United Kingdom, a major hub for U.S. film production, stands to be significantly affected. British studios like Pinewood, Leavesden, and Shepperton have hosted blockbusters such as “Barbie,” “The Batman,” and “Fantastic Beasts.” In 2024 alone, 65% of UK production spending came from five major U.S. studios and three streaming giants—Netflix, Apple, and Amazon—amounting to £1.37 billion ($1.71 billion), according to the British Film Institute.

UK tax incentives, including a 25% rebate on qualifying production expenditures, have made the country an attractive alternative to Hollywood, where federal subsidies are lacking and labor costs are higher. Jon Wardle, director of the UK’s National Film and Television School, warned that the uncertainty surrounding Trump’s proposal is already having a “chilling effect” on future projects.

British actor Brian Cox called the proposed tariffs “an absolute disaster,” while UK Culture Minister Sir Chris Bryant confirmed that the British government is in “active discussions with the top of the US administration” regarding the “very fluid” situation.

White House Clarification: No Final Decision Yet

In the wake of the backlash, the White House issued a statement clarifying that “no final decisions on foreign film tariffs have been made.” A spokesperson added that the administration is “exploring all options to deliver on President Trump’s directive to safeguard our country’s national and economic security while Making Hollywood Great Again.”

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick offered a brief comment: “We’re on it,” while USTR has yet to provide further details. Trump has indicated he is open to meeting with studio executives, though no such meeting has been scheduled.

Legal and Logistical Hurdles

Legal experts note that the administration’s authority to impose such tariffs is unclear. While Trump could potentially invoke national security under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act or use Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to address unfair trade practices, applying these to cultural products like films would be unprecedented.

Moreover, enforcing tariffs on digital transmissions—such as streaming films—poses significant logistical challenges. International agreements, including World Trade Organization rules, may also constrain the administration’s ability to act unilaterally.

Divided Industry Response

While many in the industry are alarmed, some voices have expressed cautious support. Actress Miki Yamashita said the proposal showed “a shocking level of character growth” from Trump, interpreting it as a genuine attempt to reignite U.S. filmmaking. U.S. film workers’ unions have also shown tentative approval, hoping the move could bring jobs back to states like California, which has seen a 40% drop in production over the past decade.

However, others argue that the problem lies not with foreign incentives but with the lack of competitive federal subsidies in the U.S. While states like Georgia and New York offer generous tax breaks, California lags behind, prompting many productions to go abroad.

Global Implications

The proposal has also raised fears of retaliatory measures from other countries. If enacted, foreign governments could impose their own tariffs or restrictions on U.S. films, potentially jeopardizing the $15 billion trade surplus the U.S. currently enjoys in the film sector.

At the upcoming Cannes Film Festival, where many U.S. productions seek international distribution deals, studio executives are expected to face tough questions from foreign partners. The uncertainty surrounding Trump’s proposal could make international collaborators more hesitant to invest in U.S.-backed projects.

Trump Proposes 100% Tariffs on Foreign Films, UK Productions at Risk; White House Clarifies No Final Decision

Key Updates