Rep. Jasmine Crockett Criticizes Democratic Donors for Favoring 'Safest White Boy' Over Women for 2028 Election

USPolitics05/10 22:25
Rep. Jasmine Crockett Criticizes Democratic Donors for Favoring 'Safest White Boy' Over Women for 2028 Election

Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) stated during a SiriusXM Urban View town hall that Democratic donors are backing a "safest white boy" candidate for the 2028 presidential election, reflecting concerns about electability, especially for female candidates. Crockett, speaking with DNC Vice Chair Malcolm Kenyatta, did not name the candidate but noted he is neither a woman nor a person of color. She highlighted donor influence in shaping the party's strategy, similar to support for President Biden, and expressed frustration over sidelining diversity for perceived electoral safety.

Key Updates

05/10 22:25

Rep. Jasmine Crockett Criticizes Democratic Donors for Favoring 'Safest White Boy' Over Women for 2028 Election

Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) stated during a SiriusXM Urban View town hall that Democratic donors are backing a "safest white boy" candidate for the 2028 presidential election, reflecting concerns about electability, especially for female candidates. Crockett, speaking with DNC Vice Chair Malcolm Kenyatta, did not name the candidate but noted he is neither a woman nor a person of color. She highlighted donor influence in shaping the party's strategy, similar to support for President Biden, and expressed frustration over sidelining diversity for perceived electoral safety.

Crockett’s Remarks on 2028 Strategy

Speaking with hosts Clay Cane and Reecie Colbert, Rep. Jasmine Crockett offered a candid assessment of the Democratic Party’s early maneuvering for the 2028 presidential race. In a promotional clip released ahead of the full town hall airing on May 15, Crockett said:

“It is this fear that the people within the party, within the primary system, will have about voting for a woman because every time we voted for a woman, we’ve lost.”

She continued:

“So far. And I think that that’s a natural fear because we just want to win. So there’s a lot of people that are like, ‘You know what? Let’s go find the safest white boy we can find.’ I mean, I’m just saying.”

Crockett emphasized that this sentiment is not merely speculative but is being echoed by Democratic donors. She recounted a recent conversation with a donor who told her that “all the donors are lining up behind that candidate,” adding:

“I can tell you, it’s not a Black person nor a woman, okay?”

Donor Influence and the “One Specific Candidate”

While Crockett did not identify the individual she believes is being groomed for the 2028 nomination, she made it clear that the decision is being driven by a desire to avoid perceived electoral risks. She described the donors as the same group that previously influenced support for President Joe Biden, suggesting a pattern of strategic, risk-averse decision-making among the party’s financial backers.

“When I say ‘they,’ it’s the same donors that most likely had their opinions about Joe Biden and moved,” Crockett said.

The congresswoman’s remarks have sparked speculation about who the “safest white boy” might be. Though she did not name names, political observers have pointed to several potential contenders, including Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ), Gov. Andy Beshear (D-KY), and Gov. JB Pritzker (D-IL), all of whom have been floated as possible 2028 candidates.

Gender and Electability in Democratic Politics

Crockett’s comments highlight a persistent tension within the Democratic Party regarding gender and electability. Her assertion that the party has “lost every time we voted for a woman” refers to high-profile defeats, most notably Hillary Clinton’s loss in the 2016 presidential election. This historical context appears to be shaping donor attitudes as they look ahead to 2028.

Host Clay Cane echoed this sentiment during the town hall, saying:

“A white man’s got to do it. We’re getting those callers.”

Crockett agreed, responding, “No, for real!”

The exchange underscores a broader concern that misogyny—both overt and systemic—continues to influence electoral outcomes, and that Democratic strategists and donors may be responding by defaulting to a white male candidate perceived as more “electable.”

Broader Political Context

Crockett’s remarks come at a time when the Democratic Party is grappling with internal debates over identity, representation, and strategy. The 2024 election cycle has already seen increased scrutiny of how race and gender factor into candidate viability, and Crockett’s comments suggest that these issues will remain central in the lead-up to 2028.

Her statements also reflect a growing frustration among some Democrats who feel that the party’s commitment to diversity and inclusion is often sidelined in favor of perceived electoral pragmatism. By publicly addressing these concerns, Crockett has brought internal party dynamics into the spotlight, potentially prompting further discussion about how the Democratic Party selects its standard-bearers.

No Official Response Yet

As of May 11, 2025, there has been no official response from the Democratic National Committee or prominent party leaders regarding Crockett’s comments. The full town hall conversation is scheduled to air on May 15, and it may prompt further reactions from within the party.

Crockett, who has been a vocal critic of former President Donald Trump and a rising figure within progressive circles, has not walked back her remarks. Instead, she has doubled down on her assertion that the party’s current trajectory is being shaped by a desire to avoid risk—even if that means sidelining women and candidates of color.

References

People Also Ask...