Trump's announcement of a 145% tariff sparks market volatility, as U.S. inflation data indicates rising trends.

TaiwanBusiness05/11 18:25
Trump's announcement of a 145% tariff sparks market volatility, as U.S. inflation data indicates rising trends.

On April 2, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump announced a 145% tariff on Chinese imports and threatened to take similar measures against Mexico, the EU, and other countries, leading to global market turmoil and sparking domestic controversy in the United States. April U.S. inflation data showed an estimated 0.3% increase in core CPI, indicating the potential impact of the tariff policy on prices. This policy, led by Trump's economic advisory team, aims to bring manufacturing back to the United States and act as leverage in trade negotiations.

Key Updates

05/11 18:25

Trump's announcement of a 145% tariff sparks market volatility, as U.S. inflation data indicates rising trends.

On April 2, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump announced a 145% tariff on Chinese imports and threatened to take similar measures against Mexico, the EU, and other countries, leading to global market turmoil and sparking domestic controversy in the United States. April U.S. inflation data showed an estimated 0.3% increase in core CPI, indicating the potential impact of the tariff policy on prices. This policy, led by Trump's economic advisory team, aims to bring manufacturing back to the United States and act as leverage in trade negotiations.

Trump's Tariff Policy: Content and Background

On April 2, 2025, the Trump administration officially launched the so-called "Day of Liberation" tariff plan, imposing tariffs of up to 145% on Chinese imports, setting a new record high. According to Park Jong-hoon, author of the book "Trump 2.0 Era," this policy is an extension of Trump's "America First" policy, aimed at forcing manufacturing back to the United States and to use as leverage in trade negotiations.

Trump's tariff policy was led by his core team of economic and trade advisors, including former White House trade advisor Peter Navarro, trade representative Jamieson Greer, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers Stephen Miran, and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick. According to former National Security Council official Weinstein, Navarro was one of the main architects of the policy and worked closely with other senior officials to formulate specific measures.

During his campaign, Trump promised to impose a 60% tariff on China, 100% on Mexico, and 20% on all other countries. The implementation of the 145% tariff exceeded initial expectations, indicating a further hardening of his policy stance. Trump also stated that tariff revenue could replace income tax, although this claim was criticized by many economists as "mathematically unfeasible."

Market and Political Reactions to the Tariff Policy

Trump's tariff policy immediately triggered an intense reaction in global markets. Stock markets around the world saw significant declines, and the dollar index also weakened significantly. According to a Substack column report, the dollar has fallen 10% since January, reaching its lowest level in three years. Foreign investors started to reduce their holdings of U.S. Treasury bonds and turned to Asian currencies and gold as safe-haven assets.

Domestically in the United States, the tariff policy also sparked political controversy. California Governor Gavin Newsom publicly criticized the federal government's tariff policy, stating that it led to a significant drop in import volumes at California ports, with imports at Southern California ports down 35% and the overall number of scheduled incoming cargo ships plummeting by 60%. Newsom warned that if the policy continues, consumers may face "bare shelves," and even if the policy is reversed, it would take months to restore the supply chain.

Additionally, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba expressed strong dissatisfaction with Trump's tariff policy, demanding that the U.S. fully withdraw auto tariffs and refusing to accept domestic security standards as a bargaining chip. The Japanese side stated that even if the reciprocal tariff suspension period expires on July 9, they will not easily compromise.

U.S. Inflation Data Shows Signs of Heating Up

Almost simultaneously with the tariff policy, U.S. inflation data for April showed signs of rising price pressures. According to forecasts by Bloomberg and Markets.com, the annual growth rate of the core CPI in April is expected to reach 2.6%, higher than March's 2.4%. The monthly growth rate is estimated at 0.3%, indicating continued increases in service and housing costs.

The Federal Reserve (Fed) maintained interest rates unchanged on May 7, but Chairman Jerome Powell emphasized at a press conference that there is "no rush to cut rates," pointing out that inflation and unemployment risks are rising simultaneously, and the economy is at risk of stagflation. Powell mentioned "observe" and "wait" 22 times during the meeting, indicating the Fed's cautious attitude towards the current economic situation.

According to analysis by Wall Street Journal reporter Nick Timiraos, the Fed is currently closely monitoring the transmission effects of the tariff policy on prices. Although the CPI unexpectedly fell by 0.1% in March, analysts generally believe that this trend is unlikely to continue, especially after the full implementation of the tariff policy.

Interplay Between Tariffs and Inflation

According to reports from Bloomberg and Swissinfo, although the direct impact of tariffs on the CPI has not yet fully manifested, manufacturers and service providers are already facing rising upstream costs, which may be passed on to consumers in the coming months. The Producer Price Index (PPI) for April is expected to increase by 3.1% annually, reflecting accumulating price pressures at the wholesale level.

Furthermore, dollar depreciation has exacerbated the price increase of imported goods. Substack reports indicate that the weak dollar has led to higher costs for U.S. consumers purchasing imported goods, with some products seeing price increases of up to 20%. This has a direct impact on low- and middle-income households, as imported goods account for a relatively high proportion of their consumer spending.

References

People Also Ask...